Just as I predicted in this post, the commie-lib media and Neo Coms are trying to manipulate the narrative of the Holocaust Museum shooter in to an attempt at stifling dissenting speech. This bone head is an example:
Salon.com Editor-in-Chief Joan Walsh, on Wednesday night’s “Hardball,” cited “conservatives” like Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin and Bill O’Reilly for “whipping up” a climate that sparks the likes of alleged Holocaust Museum shooter James Von Brunn and “Hardball” host Chris Matthews wondered if access to guns were to blame for the tragedy as he cried, “It’s easier to get your hands on a gun than to get somebody to make you a waffle.”
These people will take any tragedy and twist it to their political desires. They have no shame, no morals. They are evil.
Tell me, how can you read this drival and not know that you are dealing with an idiot of the first order? Notice how this intellectually dishonest Neo Com didn’t bother to mention how the commie-lib media--using her twisted rational--could very well have played a role in that Islamo-Nazi shooting the soldier last week.
Some douche bag just put the hurt on a Holocaust Museum. The question I’m asking, is how will this be treated by the commie-lib Neo Com media. Remember how the Muslim schmuck who gacked the soldier last week barely elicited a murmur from the Neo Coms? Well, I predict that this will be all over the airwaves, and held up as an example of hate from the right.
Christ on a stick. Chairman Obama has taken this country on a fast track to commie-lib land. If this doesn’t make your nuts crawl up in to your sack, I don’t know what would.
That being said, on to a slightly different topic; If The Chairman apologizes to Islamo Nazis one more time I’m going to void my bowels. Note to Chairman Obama: You don’t speak for me. I, along with most people, don’t believe that the US has a fuckin’ thing to apologize to Muslims about. In fact, Muslims should be thanking us. That’s right, thanking us. By the way, contrary to what Chairman Obama says, Algebra was not developed to any great degree by Islam. The only thing Islam is responsible for was the root of the word “algebra”. The original concepts of Algebra were developed in Greek by Greeks long before Mohammad had his first hard on for an 8 year old. What does that mean? It means that Chairman Obama is either an idiot or a liar. I’ll choose liar.
Oh, oh, wait. What about the printing press? Didn’t The Chairman say that was a great development of Islam? Well, when he opened up his gaping pie hole in that regard, again, he was lying. No, the movable type printing press was invented by a German, Johannes Gutenberg. The technology he used as a foundation was produced earlier in China.
And what about that pesky compass? You know, the one that Chairman Obama attributes, as well, to Islam. Again, a blithering lie by the leader of the Neo Coms. Chairman Obama, you lie. The compass was originally developed by the Chinese.
I remember when G.W. Bush farted in a crosswind how the commie-lib press literally crawled up his ass to look for more shit. Obama spews pure shit and they call him God. Fucking pathetic.
WASHINGTON - By claiming that Democrat Barack Obama is “palling around with terrorists” and doesn’t see the U.S. like other Americans, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin targeted key goals for a faltering campaign.
And though she may have scored a political hit each time, her attack was unsubstantiated and carried a racially tinged subtext that John McCain himself may come to regret.
First off, the “attack” is substantiated. Obama DID pal around with the terrorist Ayers. In fact Obama has a rich history of palling around with people of questionable backgrounds for years. His relationship with Tony Rezko itself should be reason for not getting a single vote from anyone. Hell, the same could be said for his relationship with Ayers, and the racist, radical who was Obama’s personal spiritual adviser, Jeremiah Wright. Pick one, anyone of them should raise alarm.
The most ridiculous statement from this pseudo intellectual smear piece, though, is this:
Palin’s words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee “palling around” with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn’t see their America?
In a post-Sept. 11 America, terrorists are envisioned as dark-skinned radical Muslims, not the homegrown anarchists of Ayers’ day 40 years ago. With Obama a relative unknown when he began his campaign, the Internet hummed with false e-mails about ties to radical Islam of a foreign-born candidate.
Whether intended or not by the McCain campaign, portraying Obama as “not like us” is another potential appeal to racism. It suggests that the Hawaiian-born Christian is, at heart, un-American.
The fact is that when racism creeps into the discussion serves a purpose for McCain. As the fallout from Wright’s sermons showed earlier this year, forcing Obama to abandon issues to talk about race leads to unresolved arguments about America’s promise to treat all people equally.
Let’s see, the ONLY one pushing ANYTHING that has ANYTHING to do with racism are commie-left dolts like the idiot who wrote this smear piece.
Bottom line; a vote for Barack Obama is a vote that flies in the face of everything that is reasonable, sane, informed, and intellectually honest.
A Barack Obama presidency is a horrifying prospect.
The more I think about McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin, the more I doubt this really was an off-the-cuff moment for McCain. Sure, Palin, the world, and most everyone in McCain’s inner sanctum—except perhaps a handful—had no idea this was coming. But I think that Sarah Palin has been on McCain’s radar for some time and more than peripherally.
If this is the case, than Palin’s pick could very well be one of the most thought out, strategized, far-sighted political maneuvers in history.
Think about it: For the past several months Obama has been positioning himself as a dramatic agent of change. The themes of “Change” and “Hope” have been his bread and butter. His outsider past—as weak as it is—has been pushed front and center. In response, McCain countered by pointing out Obama’s obvious experience defect. What this did was get Obama slightly off message which resulted in his choosing of Joe Biden, an entrenched Washington insider, as his running mate to counter the “lack of experience” argument. What Obama did was flinch at a McCain right fake. Sarah Palin is follow-up left hook.
You don’t fake with a right then follow-up with a left hook without thinking about it. It takes time to set the opponent up.
Rightly or wrongly, for many people across the nation, the “experience” argument is not as important as “Change” (“Hope” being empty rhetoric). Where Obama gets it wrong is his belief that Middle America is willing to buy an establishment Democratic Party as an agent of change simply because the Democrats are not Republicans. But for many Middle Americans the change needs to occur with the establishment, whether Democrats or Republicans. Obama’s flinch was picking an establishment insider from one of the most unpopular institutions in American history.
For years the MSM has buttressed McCain’s anti-establishment, independent streak. McCain’s follow-up left hook was picking an anti-establishment, unknown, independent minded governor with an 80-plus percent approval rating in her home state.
In just a matter of days, McCain has seized the mantle of “Change” , something that does matter to many in Middle America, by demonstrating a true willingness to think and act outside of the establishment. All of this while maintaining his obvious edge with “experience”. Obama has lost credibility as an agent of change while now relegated to talking about “experience”.
I just watched Sarah Palin personally bitch-slap Obama, the commie-lib media, and the Dems. I have to say that, at the outset, she’s my kind of gal. What Sarah Palin has done was draw a big target on her forehead and told the opposition to “Bring it on, if you really wanna dance.” Trust me, they’ll want to dance and you ain’t seen nothing yet as far as media biased slander, and politics of personal destruction.
I get the feeling that she is downright giddy at that prospect.
This is one tough chick.
Trust me when I say this; right now, the Dems and commie-libs are worried. They’re worried shitless as they should be because Sarah Palin struck a chord with a lot of people across the country. Not too many of the commie-lib elites are even aware of the power of the “common person”, but those that are know that if that block of voters can be coaxed off their asses on election day, McCain and his Annie Oakley VP are going to be riding roughshod all over the status quo.
All of the above being said, I’m still withholding my final judgment. I’ll have to see how she stands up to the heat that’s coming her way. But I will admit I do finally have some hope. It’s the kind of hope that the racist Obama wants no part of.
I know all you commie-libs are scouring the WWW in search for any dirt you can find on Sarah Palin. You dirtbags are googling “Sarah Palin nude” and shit like that. Hopefully it brought you here.
So, instead of finding what you’re looking for, I’ll give you this:
It’s dead even now, but I predict that within four weeks McCain/Palin will be up by 10 points if Palin holds her own. Mostly because of shit like this.
The commie-libs have gone completely off of their rocker. They would see a conspiracy in a mud puddle if they felt it suited their political agenda. They have no principles, no class, no dignity, and no honor.
I tell you, the commie-libs are really melting down over Sarah Palin being picked as McCain’s VP. This is typical behavior of the commie-libs when they are in meltdown mode.
Alan Colmes of Hannity and Colmes wrote a post so inappropriate and offensive the Kos Kiddies would be envious. He accused Governor Palin of not taking enough care of Trig when he was an unborn baby. A man who has no problem with a woman killing her unborn baby through an abortion actually has the nerve to ask if Governor Palin took too great a risk with her pregnancy:
Here is why the commie-libs are so whacked over Sarah Palin. It’s because of people like me. Really. See, people like me are conservatives, but not religious. To be sure, Palin will appeal to the religious dolts, but this gun totin’, gay tolorant, huntin’, fishin, don’t take no shit from the establishment, principled political babe is SO what the doctor ordered. On the outset, she represents the true American ideal in so many ways. If--and I mean IF--she pans out, the commie-libs will certainly have a lot to worry about.
The other day I heard Nancy Pelosi open her yak and say some of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard come from the pie hole of a commie-lib. In one interview I heard her claim that the Catholic Church has no stance on abortion, that even if there was a definitive answer to when life begins it wouldn’t matter, and that natural gas is not a fossil fuel.
Holy hell, this is some of the most amazing bullshit I’ve ever heard. Now, I’m going to be up front in saying that I’m not a religious person. In fact I deplore religion. Also, I have a pretty moderate stance with regards to abortion. I’m thinking that I don’t have a problem with abortion in, say, the first or second trimester, but when it comes to the third trimester …. That’s pretty much murder unless the life of the woman is at risk. Anyway, to deny the Catholic Church has no stand is a lie.
Also, the commie-lib Nancy Pelosi’s statement that even if a baby IS alive, it didn’t matter is appalling. What she’s saying is that when it comes to her version of “choice”, even murder is OK.
As far as the natural gas thing … I mean, what CAN you say. The fact that people still vote this hole into office if beyond baffling to me.
I still haven’t completely wrapped my mind around John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin as his running mate. One thing I do know for sure is that the commie-libs are all a twitter which means that she must be a major threat to them.
Really, check out some of the commie-lib websites and you can see the spewing of talking points that were obviously texted to all of them from the racist/Marxist Obama. What is amazing to me is the snide, elitist tone from the left. They tout the racist/Marxist Obama’s education and his seemingly sophisticated approach. Palin? Why she’s just a former mayor of a small town. Never mind that she is a governor. How many former governors have been President?
Also, I find it hilarious that part of the commie-lib talking points forwarded by the racist/Marxist Obama is the term “McSame” in reference to their misguided notion that McCain will be the same as G.W. Bush. The reason this is so stupid is because McCain’s willingness to buck his Party and think outside of the box is legendary. His choice of Palin is yet another example.
Tell me, how many times has the racist/Marxist Obama parted with his Party? How about Joe Biden?
Really, the more I see the commie-libs froth at the mouth and self destruct, the more I’m thinking McCain’s pick of Palin may have been a genius move. Of course we won’t know shit until at least a few more weeks, perhaps after a debate or two.
Ah, Christ on a Popsicle stick, Laura Ingraham can really get on my ass hairs. I tell you, that woman is an idiot to the tenth fucking power. Let me be up front here; I am a political conservative. I fall on the right side of the political spectrum definitively. HOWEVER ... I’m not a religious person. To be frank, religion is a big bunch of shit. Trust me, it is possible to be conservative without being religious.
The reason I’m on this rant is because I just finished listening to Laura Ingraham spew forth the idiotic idea that if John McCain picks a pro choice VP candidate it will DOOOOOM his candidacy. Bullshit. There are plenty of conservatives who don’t give a flying fuck about abortion. You don’t have to be a pro life, Evangelical Christian in order to be a conservative.
Within the abortion debate there is a common sense approach that lies somewhere between the two extremes. If you talk to most reasonable--key word being “reasonable"--people, you will find that they don’t have a pressing problem with an abortion during the first trimester. When it gets to the second trimester things get dicey. However, when it comes to the third trimester and/or partial birth abortions, REASONABLE people draw the line. Keep in mind, though, religious people are not very fuckin’ reasonable.
Bottom line; there are so many pressing issues confronting this country: Russia, Iran, The War on Terrorism, the economy, the real threat of ascendancy to the Presidency by the socialist and racist Obama. Fuck, the list never ends. If someone bases their entire vote on the abortion issue, or religion, they shouldn’t be voting.
